The Root | TheRoot.com
Skip Navigation
Cancel

Jimi Izrael

Full Post
Posted Monday, September 01, 2008 12:44 AM

Saving New Orleans

izraelj

Mayor Ray Nagin is right on point, making sure his people evacuate the Big Easy before they are besieged by Hurricane Gustav, but there’s a bigger question that needs an answer. Gustav is a category 3 storm that looks to hit American soil at a category 4.  Hurricane Katrina was a category 5, and we can all agree that there’s no sense in the locals waiting around to see what the nuanced difference between the two will be. Yes, it’s encouraging that no one is waiting for the worst case scenario and pulling the stragglers out of their homes and putting them on the bus. FEMA seems to have learned lessons from Katrina. That’s fine and I’m hoping that everyone comes out on the other end of the storm ok. But geologists say that because of its location, New Orleans is prone to this kind of thing: it is in the perfect setting for a recurring natural disaster. So, is the mass exodus of New Orleanians to parts unknown going to be an annual pilgrimage? There has to be a better, permanent solution.

 

How do we fix New Orleans?

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: womanistmusings (August 31, 2008 at 5:12 PM)

Other than being thankful for the evacuation what really is on my mind is the potential destruction the city is facing. They did not rebuild the low income housing.  Many schools, hospitals, apartment building and homes were also not rebuilt I am wondering if they didn't try to make a more permanent solution with the full knowledge that this would happen again.  Poor POC have not recovered from Katrina and this next storm could potentially drive the last of them out the city for safer pastures.  Could this not be an attempt to rid the city of those that big business, the government and the ruling bourgeoisie see as undesirable?


Posted By: agnana (September 1, 2008 at 8:12 AM)

Perhaps by recognizing that there are some things that can't be "fixed". It is arguable that the reason Katrina was such a disaster in the first place is the mentality that we can engineer our way out of natural disasters. Hurricanes are a natural part of the climate, especially in the Gulf Coast. And while there's an emerging consensus that global warming isn't necessarily going to make Atlantic hurricanes worse, it is also clear that the past 20 years have been an unusually quiet period. Add to this the fact that sea levels are rising and much of Lousiana is sinking- in part because flood control measures have reduced the delivery of sediment to the floodplain. Then there's the wildcard of how long it takes to build a levee system. The Dutch took almost *50 years* to build their massive Delta Works project and updating it for a few meters of sea level rise is going to take 20 years. Any "permanent solution" must take these facts into account.  


Posted By: nista206 (September 1, 2008 at 9:23 AM)

There has to be a wilingness to permanently rebuild New Orleans, temporary measures are not the answer. Just as w/ California's wildfires & earthquakes, New Orleans will always be the subject of hurricane woes.


Posted By: SilenceISGolden (September 1, 2008 at 10:02 PM)

What state of denial is someone in if they still dispute global warming.... NASA has confirmed its existence.

The Dutch system could work for 2 reasons.  Long term solution and provides jobs in the Bayou.

Or they can re-create the swamplands that served as a buffer zone to Gulf storms.


Posted By: Gvllgrl (September 2, 2008 at 1:31 PM)

Katrina was not a cat.5 when it hit new Orleans. It was a Cat .3.  as for what to do in NO maybe stopping the destruction of wetlands and reclaiming those wet lands that were lost is a good start. I also would not recommend rebuilding houses in parts of town that have flooded before. I live on the coast of NC and anyone who lives in a coastal community SHOULD know that hurricanes are a fact of life! If you do not have the means to deal with them maybe a move to a less hurricane prone locale might be a good idea.I know it would be hard to leave your home but if you do not have the means to take care of yourself, property etc. it is not the place for you.


Posted By: izraelj (September 2, 2008 at 1:37 PM)

Hey Gvgrll

Thanks for jumping in---are we sure it was a Cat 3? I sourced it a few different ways, and heard both, more 5 than 3. In any event, thanks for commenting, and appreciate you setting it straight.

Holla.


Posted By: Gvllgrl (September 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM)

Mr. Izrael I read your blog everyday and I really enjoy your take on things. I feel it is impportant to try to learn as much as possible  about peoples different views on the world. I have disagreed with you, agreed with you, and have had my opinions changed by you. wether I agree with you or you always make me think. Thnanks,Jennifer in NC


Posted By: feline74 (September 11, 2008 at 9:04 PM)

2 ways come to mind:

1. Build on higher ground.

2. Where-ever you build, require the buildings themselves to be habitable during all flooding and winds that spot is prone to. Not so hard--I saw a show once about a french colonial house down there built with a stone ground floor and a balconied second floor that could double as a dock.