The Root | TheRoot.com
Skip Navigation
Cancel

Jimi Izrael

Full Post
Posted Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:28 PM

Planned Parenthood vs. Political Correctness

izraelj

Sex education, as public policy goes, is always a slippery slope, and Planned Parenthood has a group up in arms, but not for the reasons you think. The Life Education And Resource Network (LEARN ) is demanding that Planned Parenthood remove a video vignette from their site that features a black guy giving a white guy a  presidential, as a school official intervenes, admonishing them to use a condom. LEARN cries racism. Me? I got no problem with the Stoner getting fellated by a Blipster. If my son were gay, this would be information I’d want him to have, and I wouldn’t care how he got it.

 

As a parent, I’ve come to peace with the idea of sex ed in the schools—I just make sure I give my kids my version as well. Sex education on the ‘net is very often just, you know, your kids clicking up on a porn site. I’m happy to see something like this available. LEARN Northeast is demanding the NAACP to call for a national boycott of the services of Planned Parenthood. Yet another ill-conceived idea from an organization mired in the cult of victimhood.  

 

 I don’t want school teachers, who can’t seem to control their own sexual proclivities, teaching my kids about the birds and bees. That said, there are parent out there who don’t teach their kids anything about sex, for fear it will make them hornier than they already are. This omission, inevitably, leads to misinformation and, in the best case scenario, the acquisition of a venereal disease. The worst case scenario? A grand-child. So we need sex ed in the schools.

 

The Rev. Rev. Dr. Clenard H Childress Jr., President of LEARN, concedes that it’s more important to inform about STDs than worry about political correctness, but is concerned about the dynamic and historical context of the visual, and suggests that the video “promotes rather than informs.” I’m not buying that. The fact that the guy giving is black? So what. Everything is not about race. My problem is more that we need more frank conversations about sex with our children and fewer squeamish liberals quashing it.

 

What do you think?

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: The Spaniard (August 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM)

Here is what should be the brunt of public sex education...

Human physiology.

How babies are made.

How diseases are transmitted and killed or protected against.

THAT'S IT!

No publicly funded detailed interactions of sex acts.  No publicly funded comdom give away.

If some kids get diseases after that and die...oh well?  Should have paid attention in school or your parents should have done a better job.

and besides...you were going to die anyway.


Posted By: Jacquiem (August 29, 2008 at 3:37 PM)

You think the best-case scenario is contracting a  venereal disease and the worst case scenario is a grand-child???  How about acquiring HIV and developing AIDS?   Where does that fit in your scale of scenarios?  And I'm not sure that I agree that race is irrelevant in this discussion, but it is not a problem historically in my view.  When nearly half of the new HIV victims in this country are Black women, I can't help but see a need to gear more education toward the Black community than has been previously.  


Posted By: arachne (August 29, 2008 at 4:33 PM)

if you think it's racist, comment on the website, tald to your friends, ask people to go to the website and ask for that segment to be removed and why. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

African-american women and men are being infected with HIV at a much higher rate than the general US population, and aren't getting the information and easy, quick testing they need. Everyone should have an HIV test yearly (quick mouth swab or finger ***, results in minutes), and check out the information on Planned Parenthood on safer sex--simple stuff.

The schools should teach how babies are made and diseases are spread. But what about what goes on in student's lives the rest of the day after school? TV characters and shows, ads for Viagra, the Internet, masturbation, boy and girlfriends, some are sexually active, some are not?

Some of the people who design  sex ed courses must live in la la land if they think that physiology, diseases, and "don't do it", is of any use to teenagers today. Abstinence education has been shown to result in higher rates of sexually active students and teen pregnancy than a comprehensive sex educstion program. Answering questions and talking about having condoms ready if you even think one of your friends might be thinking of oral sex or intercourse sure beats having sex without one because you got carried away, and anyway, they fail a lot. No one wants to show ses acts in school. Just talk about things kids are worried about, and make life a little safer. Parents still need to teach what's right and wrong.


Posted By: bigbill (August 29, 2008 at 4:37 PM)

Don't be afraid to judge.  It is not "inconvenient" or "ill-timed", teen sex is wrong.  They need to know exactly where you stand. With as many bruthas preying on young girls, and as many girls looking forward to the status that a baby will give them, it would be sheer stupidity to treat it like a bad case of chickenpox.   Part of the reason Jack and Jill exists is to keep their upscale black daughters away from ghetto trash bruthas.  If you don't have high toned folks like Jack and Jill to segregate your daughters, it's just you an your wife.  Good luck!


Posted By: reinadelaz (August 29, 2008 at 5:08 PM)

I recognize the need for information to stop the spread of HIV, but I have one question. What does two men having oral sex have to do with planned PARENTHOOD??


Posted By: cancan (August 30, 2008 at 4:38 AM)

Because sex and sexuality are hard-wired into us, children are going to learn about it either from responsible, caring adults or their peers, friends, uncaring people and the media.  On my blog, (blog.candelariasilva.com) a few months ago, I wrote an entry Real questions to Discuss about Sex and Relationships with Teens." I have heard from one instructor who actually talked with teens using these questions and a parent who discussed them with her daughter.  

Take a look and let me know what you think.

I created the list because I'm still grappiling with some of the questions.  In my reality as a woman (daughter, mother, grandmother) and having worked with teens in various ways, I know that we need to get real about sex (and so much else) with our children.  Information and discussion about feelings are crucial.


Posted By: Dantresomi (August 30, 2008 at 2:40 PM)

I think our approach to sex education is outdated. we HAVE TO TALK ABOUT IT EVERYWHERE. it won't be comfortable. It won't be easy and at times it will be downright embarrassing, but we are talking about people's lives.

Trust me, if we don't talk about it, the children will find somewhere else to learn about it

how about:

urging folks to join the PTA? how about a better rapport between parent and child, or parent, teacher, and child. ALL of us have to chip in. I don't expect the schools to teach my babies eveyrthing.


Posted By: Patra (September 5, 2008 at 6:01 PM)

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that teenagers KNOW about sex and how babies are made.  I mean, I knew as early as 10 that if a man stuck his penis into a woman's vagina, and he wasn't wearing a rubber, she could become pregnant.  And my mother, while she did talk to me about sex, about pregnancy, disease..also made it clear:  do not disgrace this family, ESP. my father, by getting pregnant.  I am young enough to come from a time where it was still SHAMEFUL to be a pregnant teen.  And so, while I was afraid of disease, and the whole concept of being pregnant while still a girl, the mere thought of standing in front  of my mom and dad with my belly all swollen made me CRINGE!  That was enough for me to keep my legs closed...at least until I was an adult, on my own, in my own home, making my own money, paying my own bills.  And because being a single mother was NOT part of my plan, I made sure I protected myself.

The element of shame and fear of disappointing one's parents has been replaced by acceptance of teen pregnancy...accepted often by mothers who were themselves, teen parents.


Posted By: MissJezebel (September 10, 2008 at 1:23 PM)

I think that the objection raised by LEARN is not so much that an African American in portrayed fellating a caucasian, it is that both parties are men. The race card is used in place of the "faggot" card. I doubt LEARN would have a problem if it were an interracial couple depicted. How about Asian and Hispanic? Would the NAACP be called then?

And to reinadelaz , Planned Parenthood is dedicated to the support of sexuality education and health. Just because the word "Parenthood" is in the name doesn't mean they only focus on heterosexual. Same as not everyone who works at McDonald's is Scottish.