The Root | TheRoot.com
Skip Navigation
Cancel

Jimi Izrael

Full Post
Posted Monday, April 07, 2008 12:42 PM

Dream On

izraelj
Last week, during the segment I host every Friday on NPR's Tell Me More with Michel Martin, we spent some time putting the dream of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. into perspective. However, we didn't have time to acknowledge the varied degrees of dream interpretation. How far you think we've come depends largely on the generational ideologies that make up your world-view. For my part, I've always looked at the legacy of the civil rights movement with a certain cynicism—the Civil Rights Generation would rather wield the baton as a rod of correction rather than pass it on.  They want to re-hash, re-live, re-package and mass-market The Dream. The Hip-Hop Generation wants to move forward.

 

I think The Dream for many white folks is the ability to do something meaningful with white privilege to nullify disparity in the social construct and indemnify black folks into alliances of convenience. We call these white folks "liberals" and while they often have the best intentions, their dreams make me nervous.

 

With the black bourgeoisie holed up in the suburbs and white folks trying to gate themselves in, I'd argue that we've gone backwards: we know more about each other, and like each other even less.  If The Dream was about making systemic changes and abolishing laws that bolster discrimination, then I have to say 'mission accomplished'. But if The Dream it involved changing the attitudes of and behaviors of people in general, I'm gonna have to say ...dream on.

 

When you sit back and look at things, how far have we come, really?

 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Cobb (April 7, 2008 at 2:21 PM)

The attitudes and behaviors of people in general are nobody's business but God's. I can't help but think about Chris Rock's rule of marital fidelity. Trust a man as far as his options.. The same goes for racism. People will get away with what they feel entitled to get away with, and that basically means less for 'dreams' than it does for laws. If people break laws and are willing to take that risk, what risk is there in betraying the dreams of dead people?

King had one thing right. it's all about the content of your character.


Posted By: Bed-Stuy White Boy (April 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM)

I agree with Mr. izrael in his "mission accomplished" statement. At the risk of denigrating the Civil Rights Movement, I live in a world where I see the fruits of that era's labors have indeed come to fruition. You want food? The government will help you. You want a place to live? The government will help you. You want to send your children to school? The government will help you. You need a job? The government will help you.

Those very things were what the Civil Rights era was all about. The RIGHT to obtain life's necessities. Now, 50 years later Mr. Izrael is asking what battles need to be fought. The struggle for these necessities is over and we are in a new era where the enemy is not the Southern lawman nor the Klansman but what is in our hearts and minds.

Because of this, the battle will not be so easily won. The battle for food, shelter, clothing, employment and education have been fought and won. However, the next fight will be for our souls. Gone are the days where tangible things like employment and education are at the centerpiece of racial discussion. Instead, we have to focus on the intangibles.

Mr. Izrael is right in that the more blacks and whites know each other, the less we like each other. A bitter pill indeed, but a truthful one at that. It's almost as if a scab has been ripped open to reveal an ugly, festering wound that has gone untreated for far too long.

How blacks and whites see each other is the new nemesis that must be defeated. If the lions of the Civil Rights era refuse to pass the torch to the next generation and are still crying about the inequities of yesteryear rather than foster an environment that makes room for fresh blood, then I suggest we all turn our backs on them and their lack of vision.

The war is still raging on and new soldiers are needed to fight the new enemy.

The enemy is Ourselves


Posted By: ManofYahu (April 8, 2008 at 1:41 PM)

We have not come nearly as far as we think we have.  This country is still racially unjust ad racism still exists. The only thing the civil rights era truly ended in large part was open violence on citizens of  color by Whites.  But the organized factions of socieey (like the police force) still take Black lives without cause, remorse or repercussions.

Education is available but not easily attainable. Public schools are joke and college is cost prohibitive. Minorities as a whole as still on the bottom rung in American society.  

The one thing example that the civil rights era gave us that we REFUSE to follow, is the effectiveness of working together. Once individual got the opporuntiy to gain an economic footdhold, it was forgotten that it took a collective to achieve it.  It will take a collective to maintain it.  Until we work together, we will continue to have nothing.

But the time is coming soon wehre we will be forced to unite or perish.  If you think Barck Obama's chance of becming President will not cuase civil unrest on par with the civil rights era, you are sadly mistaken.  

"How far have we come" is a nice question to ask. The answer will be painfull obvious in the coming months.


Posted By: marechera (April 8, 2008 at 10:17 PM)

Unfortunately, many of the "rights" blacks gained from the CRM were never realized. There is too much literature that explains the limits of Brown v. Board and the failure of the government to enforce these civil rights law. . .


Posted By: swagganj (April 8, 2008 at 10:31 PM)

"The Dream" was about attitudes first, and systemic change second. King knew that with the marches and sit-ins that they could bring about systemic change, but his dream was centered around the hope that someday we would not have to fight for systemic change, but that systemic change would automatically be born out of mutual respect and understanding between the races...unfortunately I think that due to the darker side of human nature...his dream may always be just that...a dream...

http://pcashperspective.wordpress.com


Posted By: a47percenter (April 9, 2008 at 5:31 PM)

Hey, have you ever heard of this guy named Obama?  He's keeping a low profile, flying far under the radar, but if you dig deep enough, his name might come up ...

Seriously, this country is about to have it's first black president(!).  He has the Democratic nomination sewn up numerically.  Everyone knows that except Hilary, and she'll accept it soon enough.  In the general election, he'll face McCain, who's a shadow of his former self -- a tired old man supporting a tired old war.   All McCain has left is bad health, a bad memory and bad jokes.  Even republicans don't like him.

Okay, I know "President Obama"is still speculation and may not happen.  I also know that electing a black president doesn't erase the prejudice that many people toward one another.  Yes, there's still a very long way to go.  But people of all races from Iowa to the Coasts have looked at the content of the character, rather than the color of the skin, and voted in droves for a black man.  He's on the cusp of becoming president, and if that's not evidence that attitudes and behavior have changed, what kind of litmus test are you looking for?