The Root | TheRoot.com
Skip Navigation
Cancel

Jimi Izrael

Full Post
Posted Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:54 PM

The Hardline - Gina McCauley

izraelj

Gina McCauley, famously of whataboutourdaughters.com, was offended by "B-Girls", the page on BET.com where young ladies with slashed occupations ("model/actress") sent soft-core porn shots to be posted online. So she attacked the advertisers in a blog posting headlined "Why are McDonalds, Nissan, the Army, and the Navy Whoring Out Our Daughters?" Soon they got calls and then BET's phone started ringing. The B-Girls page got removed, and even though BET says they weren't bowing to protests, McCauley claims a victory. Good for her.

 

Some time ago, I interviewed McCauley, the small-target activist on a myopic crusade to change media images of black women. McCauley casts the "models" as victims and the rappers, media companies and sponsors as predators, and that's not entirely fair. To buy that, you must suspend disbelief and imagine a world where women are empty vessels devoid of free will and personal responsibility. For me, that dog don't hunt: women are smarter than men in every way.

 

Companies are not in business to be moralists: they are in business to make money. Men love to see near-naked women in seductive poses dance to music, and are willing to pay for it. If two parties agree on a mutually beneficial exchange, exploitation becomes capitalism, last I checked. Always missing from McCauley's argument is the call for accountability: why don't we call the women themselves on the carpet?

 

We live in a time when a sextape makes you a superstar. What happened to Mom as the central role model? Young ladies learn how to manage the power of their bodies by watching their mother's cues. Moms have to spend less time at Big Butt Friday's at the local nightclub and more time parenting their kids. That's what's up. If your daughter watches BET looking for affirmation, then you've failed. You've let Snoop Dog and Lil' Kim raise your kid, and you get what you deserve.

 

It's easy to get a webpage taken down. McCauley should take on the Karrine Steffans and Tiffany Pollards of the world who have turned low-level prostitution and anti-social behavior into a viable, laudable vocation. I can't do it: it's a woman-to-woman conversation. The way to stop 'stripper feminism' is to not coddle and apologize for the women, but get them off the poles, and impress upon our daughters that the world will still love them if they keep their clothes on.

 

It's hard but it's fair.

 

Jimi Izrael is a writer and commentator living in Tallahassee, Florida.



You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: bemaal (February 12, 2008 at 6:41 PM)

you're right about women's responsibility to provide positive role models to girls, specifically mothers to their daughters.  but i think you underestimate the role of capitalism in the creation of "stripper feminism"; for every man who "love[s] to see near-naked women in seductive poses dance to music, and [is] willing to pay for it," there's someone else ready to make that money.  the reality is that, even if women made an intentional choice to quit stripping/posing for porn/turning tricks en masse, there is enough incentive (demand) for a sex industry that disenfranchised/otherwise vulnerable women would be forced into one anyway.  don't believe me?  it's happening in other parts of the world already.  there's just too much money to be made.

i'm not trying to remove all accountability from the shoulders of women who are active participants in this industry already, but isn't the attitude that some women adopt where they see themselves as deriving some kind of power from those professions just an attempt to justify their role in the ugly machine?  they have to find some kinda way to look at themselves in the mirror.  but the "ends justifying the means" argument boils down to the "i let you win" concept; unfortunately, there's no real value in having control over someone else's victory when you still lose.

the other thing that you must take into consideration is that some girls -- no matter how much their mothers love them and remind them that "the world will still love them if they keep their clothes on" -- simply give in to the enormous pressure that is placed on them to be sexual beings.  becoming a sexual being is not in and of itself a bad thing, but immature minds don't have the capacity to really understand how to control their own sexual identities, and, with the confusing messages (from men and women) in tandem with the pressure to put out, many girls will turn to the false sense of power they can get from being the hottest of the hot girls, on BET, MySpace, wherever they can get their attention on.  

i do agree with you that the way to counter the mentality is to instill a sense of self worth in our daughters and that mothers modeling positive behavior may be the most effective approach, but the impressionable, fragile psyche that many young women seem to naturally possess (i was a young girl once myself -- it's a jungle out there!) can make for a tough sell.  still, we've got to keep working at it; lord knows our competition isn't giving up any time soon.


Posted By: Arcane (February 21, 2008 at 6:42 PM)

Like always, you break it down to where it will stay broke.  But what is it with you and Big Butt Fridays?


Posted By: tobaccoschild (February 21, 2008 at 6:49 PM)

i just want to understand why all conversations about sex/sex-work have to devolve into some type of crusade to save these womens' souls.  some women want to engage in this work. they're not all broken, beaten, or unloved either.  when sex stops selling, then we will see an end to stripping etc.  another query, why aren't men who strip etc considered victims in the same way?  just a thought.