The Root | TheRoot.com
Skip Navigation
Cancel

Blog Title

Full Post
Posted Wednesday, July 16, 2008 8:05 AM

White Male Privilege - A Satire

Keith Josef Adkins

I'm going to step off of the Obama/New Yorker fury today and discuss another matter of equal urgency:  white male privilege.  That's right, I said it.  I want to discuss how those ancient cave dwellers from long ago have morphed into the world's top game players and dares anyone to question it.  [Oh, is cave too extreme?  How about TAVERN?  Or Sports Bar?].

Now I'm lucky.  My dad never sat me down and explained how a colored boy like myself must always be on the lookout for white male privilege.  He never said:  Keith, son, those white males rule the world and you must bow and ebb and move out of their way, you know, in case they suddenly get an epiphany to... I don't know... reap havoc on the Third World.  No, Pops never offered a slave, I mean, a black man, like myself those comforting words of insubordination.  My dad led by example. His demeanor at home did not alter when he was abroad.  The same charming albeit no-nonsense black fellow from the notorious West End of Cincinnati didn't vary in tone or style when navigating the white American landscape.  Oh, but if you didn't have your coffee one morning, [white men I'm talking 'bout you], and a subtle hint of condescension rolled from your tongue... well, talk about steam from the ears.  My dad would check it quickly and usually the fire department was called because he would literally burn the place down.  Just ask the counter guy from the Tri-County Kinkos, he remembers my dad quite well.   

Now all of this set up is to say this:  I was recently hired to write a TV pilot for a couple of Brooklyn-based indie producers.  They had this extraordinary, AMAZING, glorious idea for a one-hour dramedy about the life and game of soccer players.  And I was so overwhelmed and honored and grateful they chose me, a little black guy from Bucksuck, USA, to write the script and they were paying 50% of scale.  [Oh, I quiver in the skin from just thinking about their kindness].   Well, after several weeks of meetings and pitch sessions, I cranked out an outline—a blueprint of the script.  

I was tormented for days waiting for their all-knowing approval. I wanted for master [I mean, the producers] to be pleased. Well, they were not.  They claimed some of their original ideas were missing from the outline.  They didn't understand some of my Ebonics [although I used none at all]. One of them wrote out a scene of dialogue to show me how its done right... in white.  When I questioned the dialogue coaching, they condescendingly said they've known the characters for 8 to 50 years and I've known them a few months... be happy they're helping.  In a nutshell, I had made the standard black mistake by taking matters into my own hands.  I gave my voice to a project they loved.  [Which according to the WGA that's what writers do when they're hired to write, but hey... nobody substitutes the glorious genius of a white guy with no TV skills with the rantings of some black DUDE with a M.F.A. and twelve years of dramatic writing under his belt, and a film in development.  Nobody!]  

So yes... I forfeited the opportunity.  And of course, I thought of my notorious dad in all of this.  What he would've said to the "8 to 50 years" crazy, what part of their office he would've burned.   Because, trust me, I looked for a match.  I prayed they could see the steam rising from my ears.  But then I thought how mistaken I had been.  A young buck like myself actually believing these cool, worldly white guys saw me as an equal.  My intelligence, creativity, professionalism... equal. That I could actually breathe life and momentum into their dead-beat, stupid-a** TV project.  How wrong I was.  How absent-minded and child-like.  Because in the end, white boys [not all of course. never all]. But SOME white boys question the worth of everything if it's not white and full of testosterone. 

The End. 

 

 

 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: stevebiko (July 16, 2008 at 11:14 AM)

that must be really frustrating; trying to break the mold, take artistic license, and bring a different perspective to a group of producers who won't dare deviate from a template that was force fed to them by their industry predecessors. the fact that these people remain so obstinate with their scope and expectation, yet ask someone outside of their circle to write a pilot, doesn't sound like the makings of a successful tv show.

i was conversing with a few people the other night, all from different backgrounds, about the success of hbo's series "the wire". we all agreed that their success thrived on all of the varying takes; you had the creators at the top with the body, who trusted in different writers  from show to show. then you had the actors, some who were sag, but others who were just straight baltimore police, corner kids, teachers, and ex cons. yet all were pretty much allowed to inject their opinion and even twist the script to make it feel more authentic. the writers fully supported this. there was no ego. no pissing contest. no my way or the highway attitude. just a group of creators, writers, actors and directors all bringing together different points of views and yielding a masterpiece.    


Posted By: cyberphlash (July 16, 2008 at 12:38 PM)

Have you considered that instead of all this prejudice and conspiracy, your script might not have been very good? Sometimes Occam's razor delivers a close shave...


Posted By: Catch (July 16, 2008 at 12:53 PM)

I wish I was more like your dad in the sense that "His demeanor at home did not alter when he was abroad.  The same charming albeit no-nonsense black fellow from the notorious West End of Cincinnati didn't vary in tone or style when navigating the white American landscape."

That is hard to do.


Posted By: yomamaone (July 16, 2008 at 1:16 PM)

Yo daddy from Cincy's West End? Shut up! So is my mother's family.  And they led me by the very same example as your father did you.  Oh, how many store clerks were brought to their knees by my mother's tongue, which was quickly followed by her economic protest.  Must've been in the water at Lincoln Center pool, huh?

Your report, it seems, is very much in line with the New Yorker cover issue, after all. Both cases appear to display the same brazenly unquestioning sense of privilege that, if not caually linked, is certainly correlated with whiteness and testosterone.  Must've been in the water that flowed outside those caves.


Posted By: Folic Pollen (July 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM)

Well Keith Josef, when you take about " White Privilege" you always have to accompany privilege with his other two partners, White supremacy, and White power. In some circles it's called the " Unholy Trinity". Your father knew this fact all to well. It's so funny because my father acted the very same way! People of our parents generation can tell you all kinds of stories about privilege, power and supremacy. Yet, they new all to well about speaking out about against the power structure. I was so glad to hear your story because your story is is the script of so many African American lives.

However, hope, a willingness to survive, and small advancements by African Americans keeps the desire of equality alive inside us. Every now and then the power structure reminds us that we are not considerd "equal" to them. They always remind African Americans that "we can make you and we can break you". So don't get out of line. It's unfortunate that the masses of Afrian Americans think that they can penetrate this barrier with education, hard work, and personal responsiblity. These are excellent qualities to have, and African Americans should not stop promoting these qualites in themselves and other, yet what they don't realize that these individual qualities is what the power structure uses to separate us. As long as African Americans live by the motto " I got mine, now you get yours" we will always struggle as a people. We as African Americans have to build a power stucture of or own and stop trying to assimilate into into this European based power structure that controlls our everday lives.


Posted By: jacksmith (July 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM)

I think it is people like Keith who keep rascism alive in America. Yes, the blacks were enslaved and mistreated and everything that happened was horrible but it does not give him or anyone else the right to a sense of entitlement or retribution towards white america. Did you ever stop to think about the atrosities that were commited against the Jewish people ?!??!! FAR FAR FAR WORSE !! Infact , that scale does not even come close to matching. It is not like the black people were the victims of trying to be WIPED OUT. That was complete genocide. 7 MILLIONS JEWS were killed in the holocaust. Jews were enslaved for thousands of years by the egyptians  to build the Pryamids, You don't see Jews hating on every German they come into contact with.

I think it is time to move foward and stop being whiny brats about what the white people owe the black people. It's pathatic.

You aren't owed anything extra. Just respect LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. If anything the Jewish people should be owed something. Thank the heavens everyday that you weren't alive in that time period and were Jewish. You're whole family could have been dead.


Posted By: nneka824 (July 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM)

JackSmith: "people like Keith" do not keep racism alive.  Racists keep racism alive.  You can deny the truth all you want.  The concept of white privilege is stronger than ever.  It is not to white people's advantage to acknowledge this.  That is why they don't.  They know it is wrong, but as long as most of them still support that belief system with their daily actions and decisions, it will perpetuate - it is to their advantage,

And nobody here has said Jews were never mistreated.  Jews have suffered from many unfair and deplorable practices from people who were (keyword here) RACIST.  And please do not compare the historic sufferings of these ethnic groups - BOTH groups have suffered.  The difference is that Jews have been able to assimilate better into "mainstream" America because they look more like "mainstream" Americans.  All they have to do is not mention or change their surnames.  And they can virtually blend in (and enjoy white privilege).  And their adherence to certain cultural codes, i.e. not marrying or doing business with outsiders, has given them distinct socioeconomical advantages over blacks.  Blacks - on the other hand - look so different (i.e. skin, hair) they are UNABLE to blend in.  Former black slaves also had to survive daily in a hostile environment set up to see them fail.  These are some of the main reasons why I think blacks CONTINUE to suffer the effects of racism the worst, while other ethnic groups are able to rise.  

Whites (mostly southern) were very upset with the ending of slavery and have done everything they could since then to make black slaves and their decendants pay for surviving it.  This is very deeply rooted.  No other ethnic group has had to be subject to Jim Crow - just blacks.  The only way it will change is when people (EVERYBODY) change their attitudes.  The media only exacerbate this problem.

I'm not saying that black people have had no hand in the situation they find themselves in.  I'm just saying they face more difficult obstacles than other ethnic groups in the U.S. and need to cover more ground if they are going to pull themselves up out of the muck and mire as a people.  You need to take some African-American History classes or something.  Broaden your perspective, man.  Be more sensitive to these people's plight.


Posted By: MilesEllison (July 16, 2008 at 4:35 PM)

The most interesting contemporary sociological phenomenon in America is the existence of racism without racists.  Virtually every day, there are examples of subtle and not-so-subtle racism, yet nobody is a racist.  


Posted By: Future Ph.D (July 16, 2008 at 5:21 PM)

Thank you nneka824 you hit the the hammer dead on the nail.  It's the insensitivities and "privlege" of others that keep them from learning about who Black people really are.  But then again if white people can't be the great emancipators then can't connect.

peace, the struggle continues.


Posted By: Folic Pollen (July 16, 2008 at 7:25 PM)

Jack, baby, the African Slave trade  killed more Black people than the holocaust killed Jews, and slavery lasted longer. Oh by the way,Jewishish Authorities still today hunt down German officers who were  associated with the concentrations camps and any one who help and aided German officers.Jewish organizations will never let the world forget the holocaust,and on top of that, they received repartions. Oh yea, there is no historical account of Egyptians enslaving Jews, In Jewish history or Egyptian history. And there no historical account of a mass exodus by Jews from Egypt. Bro, these things you speak of are religious lore. U've been watching to many movies.


Posted By: rjgarrick (July 17, 2008 at 1:25 AM)

White privilege is a curse that we share unevenly.

.


Posted By: Andante (July 17, 2008 at 4:24 AM)

Here we go again - the "Up from Slavery" routine Blacks trot out at every turn - black made movies, literature, art.  It's all the same.  Get Over Yourselves!!  Im a well educated and cultured "brother", educated on 3 continents - including Europe.  I have never faced the sort of blatant rascim touted here.  Why - how I act  and how I present myself are key to keeping potentially hateful people off balance.  If you have have a problem with "Whitey",  stop complaining - be better, achieve more, stand out.  An old saying goes - "The best for of revenge is success"


Posted By: sunnyrebel (July 17, 2008 at 4:33 AM)

I'm perceived as "white" and "full of estrogen" (and not really a team-sports aficionado),  so in the world that you describe with its Brooklyn-based indie producers my words and ideas would no doubt be discounted in very much the same way you describe yours having been. I don't intend to emote about white male privilege at length but I believe it is very true that  SOME white boys definitely do regard themselves and their perspectives on any -- and all -- aspects of known life as being the ultimate and unassailable standard of excellence and verity. They put themselves in  their own narrowly constructed box of a universe by doing so,  which must be a very constricting  place to live.


Posted By: thrasher (July 17, 2008 at 9:07 AM)

Keith,

Thanks for having the courage to write about this, often in the Obama world of Blackness it is frown upon to even suggest or discuss white racism , white supremacy , cause we all know that such truths do not exist anymore... It is Black victimhood and and irresponsibility that causes our failures and shortcomings...

Your tale is required reading for those in my inner circle...Thanks again for sharing....


Posted By: DrewReason (July 17, 2008 at 10:12 AM)

Something tells me that your inner warrior was at work here.  The  black inner self at war with white people yet determined to ignore that the war does not exist.

Going to work while at inner war is usually another social experiment in victimization, victimhood, et that makes for good writing, if not venting, and it sometimes makes for good reading.


Posted By: beyondthepale (July 17, 2008 at 1:00 PM)

Seriously?  You're mad that they didn't recognize your quality as a writer, yet you speak of "reaping havoc"?  The term is "wreaking havoc".  Reaping means gathering or harvesting, not inflicting; arguably the exact opposite of what I believe you intented to convey.  Either you don't know the common term, or you failed to proofread; either way, pretty amateurish.  And do you really mean your Dad "literally" (actually; to the letter, etc.) burned down a Kinkos?  Do the police know about this act of arson?  Perhaps you meant "figuratively", or else you literally admire a destructive, potentially lethal criminal act.

Seriously, dude.


Posted By: thevegasstyleguy (July 17, 2008 at 2:00 PM)

Just so you know, the powers that be always have fragile egos. I do tv treatments and am constantly fought with on everything. And guess what? The customer is always right. If you're so talented Mr. "award winning writer" just concentrate on doing your own thing. Look at Darren Starr, he didn;'t allow anyone to change Desperate Housewives and well you know the rest.

We need to stop blaming whitey for everything. I bet there are a thousand jewish bys re-writing screenplays as we speak because some idiot producer wants to keep control on their project. Black folk (I'm sorry, this is THE ROOT, African American) need to just do their own. Maybe then not everything about us would include ebonics and ghetto life.

Everytime I have worked with Black men there has been huge problems with ego and control. And don't even get me started on getting my money from them. I've written and had produced projects with Whites, Latinos and Asians. Never has a project gone through with Black men.

So, please, step down from the pulpit and get back to work and do it your way. Stop whining!


Posted By: Keith Josef Adkins (July 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM)

BeyondthePale... I love this!

This story is an exaggerated, satirical approach to what happened to me.  Names, incidents, have been blown up and distorted.  [Distort:  meaning to twist out of the true meaning or proportion].  And, no, my dad didn't literally burn down a Kinkos, you idiot.  And thanks for the spelling correction, but I was playing with the word. You know, like they did in a title of an episode of the now defunct DEAD LIKE ME.  [In fact, thanks for stopping by and offering your general perusal and "correction"]. I love this. I absolutely LOVE you felt the IMPULSE to put me in my place.  Love!


Posted By: justawhiteguy (July 18, 2008 at 1:15 PM)

BeyondthePale

It is intended, you idiot


Posted By: justawhiteguy (July 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM)

Glad it is a Satire, Mr. Adkins.

Please be careful.  There are those in this country who are privileged.  Not all white, but the majority of the people in the US are white so it makes sense that the majority would be.

I'd just like to suggest that most of the achievers in this country earned it.  I'm careful not to use the word deserve, (Paris Hilton comes to mind)  If by chance they didn't earn it then their parents/grandparents probably did.

I would ask that you do not allow this train of though to run back to slavery and privilege on the backs of slaves, most of us (us being all races creeds and colors) are from families that arrived after 1865.


Posted By: beyondthepale (July 18, 2008 at 10:08 PM)

OK, Mr. Adkins, fair enough.  Taken as the words of an unreliable narrator/object of your satire, your explanation of “reap” and “literally” makes sense.    Why, though, was I confused? The word “satire” is placed helpfully right there in the title, for Heaven’s sake.  I mean, even an idiot should have been able to pick that up.  So what could the problem be?  Let’s see.

It’s a satire. Every satire has a target. You launch your article with a mention of the New Yorker cover, which is in itself a satire of the stupid slurs and rumors about Obama.  You either get the joke, and are satirizing the people who don’t; i.e., the hypersensitive and literal, or you don’t get the joke, and you are satirizing the buffoons at the New Yorker who must believe such outmoded and stereotyped things about Blacks, Muslims, and so on.  Given your insistence on your bona fides as a writer and, presumably, a humorist as well, let’s assume you got the joke. So, the target of your ridicule is the hullabaloo about the cartoon. Got it.  So far, so good.  The opening lines of your piece are satirizing equally crude stereotypes and assumptions about the malign intentions of Whites.  This either targets the creators of the New Yorker cover (“See, guys, how do you like it?”), which leads us back to the Adkins-didn’t get-it-camp, which seems unlikely, or the hypersensitive (“See, folks, treating everything as oppression from the Man sounds stupid”).  The broad “things I wasn’t taught” section seems to confirm my “targeting-the-hypersensitive” theory.  

Then the “my dad didn’t say…” section, featuring the disputed “reap”.  If you’re playing with the word, making the speaker sound ignorant, maybe you’re satirizing the speaker, putatively a scaredy-cat, overly deferential Black person who thinks White are Cro-Magnons to be feared?  Satirizing the way some African Americans teach their kids to view Whites?  That would be consistent with the premise you seem to set out initially.  Fine.  Oh, maybe you meant something else, but we'll get there.

Next up, your Dad. Your dad didn’t say those things, right?  So he’s not an object of your scorn that way. But he did burn down a Kinkos.  Or didn't. So, maybe now you’re satirizing Black folks who think they need to be aggressive. Or Black folks who think they can't be assertive like your Dad (which is what I think you're actaully conveying, but who the hell knows). Or maybe it’s aimed at the stupidity of Whites, like, if you think this is how Black folks teach their kids then you’d believe he’d burn down a Kinkos, and that Obama’s a terrorist.  That gets convoluted and overcomplicated, and doesn’t support the first theory. Which leaves us with the possibility that the Kinkos bit is aimed at satirizing…well, at this point it's getting hard to say. I’m an idiot, though, so help me out here.

Ah, now to the heart of the piece.  The outrage over your rejection seems a little overheated, so we’re back to satirizing the portrayal of White men as the boogeyman (and let me point out here that lots of the comments posted expressed sympathy about your shoddy treatment, so apparently they didn’t get it either.  I guess you’ll get around to calling them idiots later).  Your outrage, though, is actually logical.  You do have the credentials to be treated better. They did miss the point, at least in accusing you of using Ebonics, right? So here you either miss your target (it should be as absurd as the rest of the piece), or  you meant every word and shift your tone from absurdity to reality.  Who are you satirizing now?  White guys who are jerks?  Fine, but that’s the opposite of where you started.  Let’s take a quick tally:

Possible Objects of Mr. Adkins’ Satire, Thus Far:

1. People who are easily offended by absurdist jabs against the slurs against Obama

2. People who make absurdist jabs against the slurs against Obama

3. People who think White guys are cavemen-type who hang out in bars

4. People who think White guys are all-powerful

5. White cave-man type guys who hang out in sports bars and think they are all-powerful

6. People who teach their kids to kowtow to Whites

7. People who think people teach their kids to kowtow to Whites

8. Your Dad, who didn’t teach you that, but burned down a Kinkos. Or didn’t burn it down

9. People who complain of their treatment at the hands of White guys

10. White guys who don’t treat qualified Black guys as equals

11. People who expect fair treatment at the hands of White guys, those caveman-like, sports-bar-frequenting bastards

12. People who, uh, don’t expect fair treatment from White guys…unless they have an MFA, in which case…Oh, I give up.

C’mon.  Your Will Smith piece, though admittedly of more modest ambition, was focused, had some amusing lines and made sense; this is all over the place.  What are you satirizing?  Who are you making fun of?  What on earth is your point?  When Jonathan Swift sat down to lacerate the English, there was never any doubt about the target of his anger.

Let’s say it this way.  Your argument that you actually do know the meaning of “reap” and “literally”, I concede.  Point:  Mr. Adkins.  My argument that the satire was unfocused, lacked cohesion or internal logic, leading to confusion about who is speaking and why, let alone reliability of same, well, see above.  Point:  Me.  

I think we’re even.  Let’s call it a draw.  Good luck with your film.


Posted By: Keith Josef Adkins (July 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM)

BeyondthePale.... my point is that your comments make my point.  And any clear-thinking person knows what I mean by that.


Posted By: Paulettejr (July 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM)

As much as 'they' think they are open minded they are ignorant and self centered beyond belief.  If they knew the characters for ‘8-50 years’ they should have written the script themselves.  

They hire you because you're more than qualified and then treat you like their servant. Asses.

:roll:

Paulette

www.letustalk.wordpress.com


Posted By: astraea (July 29, 2008 at 3:47 AM)

dear beyond the pale, and you are truly that. let me just help a bit with what the term white privilege means. it's not about being privileged in a monetary sense. it's about a feeling. it's about the ability to feel that the world is yours, even though other people are living on the soil that you claim at the time. but hey, that's never been a deterrent. let's just kill em and take it. OR, let's trade some pretty glass for it. OR, let's put a starbucks in and make sure that very few of the older people living there could possibly afford to continue.  it's thinking that affirmative action is something that takes jobs away from others who are more deserving, when it actually is to make sure that a woman, or a person of color who is AS deserving can have a chance at a job that may go to someone else if the point of integration is not enforced. it's knowing that you can walk in a jewelry store to return the pieces loaned to you (through your publicist, as is the norm) for an awards show, and not be followed around because they 'didn't recognize you' in your casual weekend attire.

and poor, dear jacksmith, don't try the these folks have it much worse than you game.  black people  were snatched up for slavery, killed on the way over, killed when they got here, had the color raped out of them, got lynched through the civil rights era, got killed through apartheid, and are still being taken advantage of and killed in many places.  as a matter of fact, as jews are descendants of africa, i'm going to claim THAT holocaust too.


Posted By: afeliciano (July 31, 2008 at 9:47 AM)

Get over yourselves, blaming everything on whites. READ your history. As someone who grew up in South-eastern Africa , I know it was WEST AFRICANS who warred on and enslaved EAST AFRICANS and sold them to the Portuguese as trade for liqour and guns. Hmm, African tribes selling killing each other, making the captives as slaves, and selling them for alcohol and guns. Tell me really: how much has changed today?


Posted By: chrissy (July 31, 2008 at 10:52 PM)

beyond the pale, i think it is quite evident that his father did not "literally" burn down a kinkos. " Do the police know about this act of arson?" ?

as you would say, "seriously, dude?"


Posted By: WhitePeopleArePeopleToo (August 3, 2008 at 1:25 AM)

You are not a slave. Don't play that game. If someone is paying you-regardless of skin color, experience, education, etc-they are your "master" as you said & you should follow direction (assuming you aren't doing anything illegal, of course). When they criticized you, did you automatically assume it was because you were black? Seems like it.

As a TV producer myself-let me say this-when we give parameters for a story-we expect them to be followed. Creative license is allowed of course, provided the original criteria are met. Perhaps you simply didn't give them what they were asking for. They didn't fire you-you walked away. That means they wanted to work with you to mold that story & make it fit for ALL of you.

Get over the race issue and grow a thicker skin-you got critiqued, your pride was hurt & you blame your race. Oye.


Posted By: WhitePeopleArePeopleToo (August 3, 2008 at 1:39 AM)

Following the comment thread here, I must comment on this so-called White Supremacy issue some of  you seem to think is SO prevalent.

Wanna know what it is? Mama & Daddy (and grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, so-called cousins, etc) NEVER told white people "watch out for them black folk-they're out to getcha!". Nope. White families (generalizing here, as the white supremacy comments are generalized) simply encourage their offspring to keep on moving up-a "boogeyman" is never identified. White children are told to "just do it" (as nike says)....whereas, I'm gathering here, black children are told "just do it-but watch out for that white kid".

Best way to end racism & reverse racism....QUIT TEACHING IT. Stop teaching your children it's alive (that goes for all of us-black, white, purple, pink, yellow, green) and teach them how to treat everyone with respect instead. My brother & sister are mixed...and they're "dark" in a "light" family. It doesn't matter. No one, in our family or out, treats them differently. They go to school with a diverse student body and the only thing either has ever heard about their race was a girl who asked my sister...."how do you get your hair to poof like that?" Simply. They aren't treated differently because they simply expect to be treated the same.


Posted By: Ultracet. (August 22, 2008 at 8:27 PM)

Is ultracet addictive. Ultracet vs vicodin. Ultracet.