The Root | TheRoot.com
Skip Navigation
Cancel

Blog Title

Full Post
Posted Thursday, May 08, 2008 1:07 PM

Chitlins and Martinis: No Thanks.

Keith Josef Adkins

When an upscale neighborhood committee tells an upscale black lounge that they don't need a liquor license because you don't need a martini when you're eating Chitlins... what is one to think? 

My writing life is pretty consistent.  The bulk of work happens between 7am and 3pm.  Then I grab the backpack, head into the Big Apple's cultural and social terrain and bump heads with my folks who like to think big and do it up with style.  So it's no surprise I can be found in some back corner of some funky new lounge sipping on something mellow and trying to gear conversation away from the topical Top 40 and into something that challenges how we live on the uh... personal-politcal-cultural front. 

Which slides me into this:  I've recently discovered this new spot in Soho called Lola. A downtown Manhattan upscale swank catering to the neo-Buppie and all of his or her doctor-lawyer friends.  It's not my ideal atmosphere [I tend to smooze in a more artsy scene], but I was surprised to hear they had no liquor license.  That this specific clientele was being asked to chill without a chiller.  Well, Chloe A. Hilliard wrote an article in this week's Village Voice that exposes the crazy behind Lola's lack of liquor flow. 

Hilliard reveals that the Soho Alliance, a community action group, has little tolerance for the liquor license crowd.  Apparently, the area in Soho where Lola resides has been inundated recently with new, hip spots to drink and lounge.  However, in the case of Lola, folks are crying racism. Why?  Well, Soho Alliance director Sean Sweeney has been very critical about Lola's need for a liquor license.  Allegedly, he's gone on record to say:  "I don't think you need a martini to go with chitlins and collard greens."  And... What type of wine pairs with Jambalaya?  He's even been accused of spearheading an aggressive anti-Lola campaign:  somebody's been posting anti-Lola flyers all over Soho.

Many of Lola's supporters believe the neighborhood group is concerned the martini-drinking black crowd will get rowdy and spill violence into the street because that's what martini-drinking professional black folks do on Hump Day.  Get lit and create lots of ruckus just to irritate The Man.

It's pretty ridiculous to me that any establishment is expected to exist without liquor on the shelf.  Especially in NYC where folks will spend twenty dollars for a Ginger Beer Mojito.  But I am suspect and disturbed by the Soho Alliance's aggressive stance against Lola's.  It seems we're always watched, accessed and policed.  It's just a sad state of affairs when the image of professional black people chilling and listening to music garners so much outrage.  Honestly, if the spot is lucky it may be around for a year. 

I've attached Chloe Hilliard's article for your perusal. 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: threecee (May 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM)

G*d damn!  I'll have to check them out and support them.  Hopefully, they'll last more than a year.  I knew that watching "Sicko" on DVD last night wouldn't put me in a good mood, and now this.  I don't even want to know the latest about the Sean Bell demonstrations and Barack/Hillary, being that it's all gloomy weather outside right now, and it would make me even more depressed/angry...  I need a drink! :)


Posted By: MeJones (May 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM)

It would be great if a public relations professional (maybe even one of Lola's patrons?) would put together a great ad campaign addressing the issue, and make it trendy to not serve liquor (until they get their license of course). I think they'd get a lot of support just on gp.

ITA with your accessment about how we're ALWAYS being watched no matter what. How the hell is some fool brazen enough to make that chitlins and martini comment?! If they started serving chitlins in French style bistros i'm sure he would be right in line. And the previous poster is right as well-it's feeling like the 1950's right about now.


Posted By: cancan (May 9, 2008 at 10:20 AM)

Wow!  There are so many things colliding in my mind to say but it all comes back to Wow.  The ways of (some) white folks.  You cain't never forget.

Wow.


Posted By: BNWWill (May 9, 2008 at 3:15 PM)

who needs fine wine when kool-aid will suffice!

the way we are treated is absolutely appalling. some like to forget that this country was built on our backs.


Posted By: ljcuddlenurse (May 19, 2008 at 2:08 AM)

Eeek! I'm a G*D Yankee (folks from above the Mason-Dixon Line who've moved below it and stayed) and just happened upon this article...and I thought these types of issues only had to be dealt with down here in the Deep South. I'm with cancan--WOW! Oh yes, and: eeek!


Posted By: Ultram tramadol. (June 15, 2008 at 12:36 PM)

Ultram. Ultram er. Ultram withdrawal. Ultram pain. Buy ultram cheapest site.


Posted By: miquidub (July 11, 2008 at 2:00 AM)

It is a shame to hear of such nonsense in this day and age. With all the professionals, Lawyers, paralegals,police officiers, etc, is the no one who knows how to legally or otherwise challenge Soho Alliance. Lola and Black professionals don't just whine  and cry racism. FIGHT BACK!!! Find out the dirt (virtual, digital, finacial,personal,etc) on Mr. Sweeney and use leverage to get what you want. PLAY HARD BALL!!! It is your right don't let a self-appointed neighborhood lynch mob bring you down.